X

Deep Dives #5: Journals From Armageddon – East of West Review Pt. 1 (#1 to #29)

With East of West wrapping up its seven year journey into the Apocalypse, John and I are taking a look back at the Jonathan Hickman, Nick Dragotta, Frank Martin, and Rus Wooten series from Image Comics!

In addition to the CBH Deep Dive podcast, I’ve also included our “Journals From Armageddon,” an email conversation John and I had prior to this conversation. Check out part one here covering East of West #1 to #29 (the first two in-universe years of the Apocalypse), and we’ll be back in January 2020 with part two covering East of West #30 to #45, the final year of the Apocalypse!

For previous Deep Dives:

Support For Comic Book Herald:

Comic Book Herald is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn a qualifying affiliate commission.

Comic Book Herald’s reading orders and guides are also made possible by reader support on Patreon, and generous reader donations.

Any size contribution will help keep CBH alive and full of new comics guides and content. Support CBH on Patreon for exclusive rewards, or Donate here! Thank you for reading!

For more, check out the full guides on Comic Book Herald:

Best of Jonathan Hickman

Dave’s Faves: The Best Comics of All Time!

Comics discussed include:

Journals From Armageddon

Dave:

Hey John,

I thought for this month’s deep dives we could start a back and forth about thoughts and questions we have as we read/re-read East of West. Think of this as a completely optional series of thought starters and possible dialogue to run as a companion on CBH once we’ve recorded our episode on part one.

Now, part one is going to focus on the first two years of the Apocalypse (up to around issue #30 in the series), but obviously big picture questions and thoughts are fair game. I haven’t read the most recent issue in the big East of West finale, but otherwise there aren’t really any spoilers I’m worried about.

Let’s go!

Line one, panel one: “The dream is over.”

Ok, I won’t be breaking down this book on a line by line basis (#EastofPedantic) but this is the only line of dialogue for nearly three pages while Nick Dragotta, Frank Martin, and Rus Wooten’s art do the work. I can’t read this line and think of anything other than John Lennon’s broken crooning on “God” from his first post-Beatles solo album.

It’s a pretty famous song for a number of reasons, not least of which is that “The dream is over” sequence is the most deliberately Lennon addresses the end of the Beatles. It’s the build to that moment which feels more relevant to Hickman’s thematic opening statement here, as Lennon delivers an impassioned series of “I don’t believe in…” statements culminating in “I just believe in me. Yoko and me. That’s reality.” It’s about as direct a “kill your idols” song as a flippin’ Beatle could deliver, and that’s literally what we see the three horsemen discussing in this opening sequence.

Another band of four, the horsemen just broke up too! Death is missing from their crew, and the remaining three horsemen are ready to set the world on fire if he won’t rejoin.

Even the Apocalypse isn’t going according to plan. The dream is over.

From there we get our first all white text transition with “The things that divide us are stronger than the things that bring us together.” The combination of these statements quite quickly builds a unified pessimism at the hear of this world. The trick will be filling it with purpose and life.

John: 

Great thought about Lennon! I’m really excited with the collations you’ve spotted:
  • The theme of breaking up the team
  • the fact that we’re hearing it now from a man beyond death
  • The sheer aesthetic match of the song itself!
Brilliant thought! (Vastly better than my scoring with Morrissey’s “I know it’s over.”)
Here are a few ideas I’ve been gathering.
The two main reasons for Armageddon prophecies
I’ve been reading a number of books and papers on eschatology in preparation for this month’s “Superpowers Reviewed” article. So these are taken straight from theology and current secular views.
 
1.) They Provide Definitive Answers
Virtually all cultures create their own End Of Days prophecy to reaffirm their solutions to “The Big Questions.” These stories act as the conclusion to the culture’s narrative, the final summation that “proves:”
  • the immortality of the human soul
  • the value of the culture’s moral systems and rituals
  • and the unknowable will of the Gods
Even the word “apocalypse” comes from the Greek “to reveal” (something enormous.) It has nothing to do with war or death, only understanding. It is for this reason that it’s exceedingly common for Apocalypses to be seen as ultimately a celebration of faith, not a fear of death.
 
2.) They’re About Organizing Chaos
Somewhere around 2-2.4 million years ago, human beings became possessed by a contradiction:
  1. The realization that we could all die at any moment, consumed by some arbitrary mass death event (disease, floods, volcanos, war, etc).
    As a rule, people don’t do well with arbitrary things—particularly not ones with such incredible power—so we made…
  2. A mental shield that makes all people secretly believe they’ll be the first to cheat death.
So you can think of End Times prophecies as a cultural immune system that balances these two competing ideas. We build these stories to say “yes, your fear of extinction is correct. BUT it will happen in an orderly fashion, when and how we predict. Things are under control. You do not live in the final days of man.” It’s like an OCD tick that requires you to knock on doors or wash your hands as a way of controlling car crashes or the weather.
This is in direct contradiction to our “Michael Bay” conception of the end times, where everything seems like pandemonium.
How Does East of West Use These Two Reasons?
For me, East of West breaks down as follows:
It makes great use of the driving force behind Apocalypses 
  • Solipsism
  • Need for order and meaning
  • Avarice, petty divisions, and lust for power
It’s “missing” common tropes
  • No fire and brimstone, rain of frogs, etc
  • No divine or demonic armies
  • No Hieronymus Bosch or Zdzisław Beksiński influence
  • No Messiahs or saviors
What does that mean about the book? 
Order and Chaos in East of West
I’m re-reading the book, I’m grabbed by how perfectly orderly it is in the beginning, but with a clever twist
  • “Villains” like Conquest, Famine, War, and the Chosen all represent a call to (terrible) order. A desire to stay on script and follow the rules.
  • “Heroes” like Death, Xiaolin, Chamberlain, and Freeman all represent a form of chaos. A defiance of that prophecy, and one that drags of players off script as the story goes on.
The first year of the book is all about this consensus agreement that the world must end. In fact, there’s an unexpectedly small amount of direct conflict between the two sides in this period. Instead, it’s primarily characters talking, either ratifying their commitment to their cause or else conspiring against it.
When there is conflict, it feels like all parties are merely squabbling over finer details of the end, trying to seize last-second opportunity to gain small advantages or earthly vengeance. A very human response to an inhuman time.
Is “the Western” America’s Version of the Prophetic Apocalypse? I’m Genuinely Asking.
If yes, then referencing classics like The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, Shane, Rio Lobo, and/or The Searchers:
  • Who or what represents “hell” in these films?
  • Who or what is the “Messiah” archetype?
  • What constitutes the common, necessary elements of the “prophecy?”
  • Do they say anything about the immortality of the human spirit?
  • …our morals and rituals?
  • …the will of God?
What do East of West and Secret Wars have in common? Which did it better as a comic?
 
Examples:
  • Apocalyptic beasts
  • Conspiracies
  • Delivering Philosophy
  • Fractured America
  • God Children
Which book is the better Armageddon?
Based on the above “two main reasons for prophecies.”
(Maybe we leave this for the second podcast)
Clever Subtleties

“Holy” Trinities support the story…

  1. Death • Xiaolion Mao • Babylon
  2. Death • Crow • Wolf
  3. Cheveyo • Wolf • Crow
  4. War • Conquest • Famine
  5. Conquest • Ezra Orion • Hellbeast
…Binaries fall apart fast
  1. Andrew Chamberlain • (ex)President
  2. Bel Solomon • The Ranger
Artistic References:
  1. Dali’s The Temptation of Saint Anthony
  2. Dali’s Elephants, 1948
  3. Luis Buñuel’s Un Chien Andalou
  4. Boston Dynamics’s Spot

Dave:

Me: Hey, ya ever listen to solo Lennon?
You: Here’s a concise summation of humanity’s fixation with the Apocalypse.

Clearly, I’ll need to bring my A game.

One of the more intriguing components of the Apocalypse in East of West is that this is round two. It’s not just the certainty the devout have towards The Message so much as the fact that we know the Horsemen already tried and failed to deliver. The question becomes less “Is Armageddon on the horizon?” and instead “Will it take this time?” We’re made aware of the horsemen’s previous existence in this world through efficient flashbacks, primarily centered on the forbidden romance between Death and Xiaolion Mao but so many big picture questions remain early on.

The horsemen are fully developed in these flashbacks, but have lost their Death. What were they trying to accomplish? What did they accomplish? What happened exactly to reduce them to children in our narrative?

And perhaps more importantly for the belief in The Message and the inevitably of Apocalypse – was their presence made known far and wide? Certainly the Chosen operate with a degree of secrecy, but what does this world know?

I think your analysis of “End Times” is extremely astute, and goes a long way to explain the evergreen nature of the themes driving Hickman and Dragotta’s success with this book. Armageddon stories are always appealing. In Patton Oswalt’s memoirish autiobiography he posits that creatives all inevitably fixate on either zombies, spaceships, or wastelands. It’s genuinely difficult to break free from these categories, and East of West falls neatly into the “Wasteland” archetype. Voracious consumers of fiction are predisposed to consider tales from the wastelands, the trick is imbuing the collapsing world with enough detail to separate the fallout from the mushroom cloud.

As you note, though, the actual end of the world is almost background noise. It’s the world we read (with open eyes) but it’s not why I’ve come back multiple times. When I try to articulate why I keep coming back to East of West it’s Dragotta’s cityscapes and spiderhorse mounts, and Hickman’s cryptic quotables from every character’s lips, but more than anything it’s the politics! The regions and leaders of this not so hard to imagine America 2069 are fascinating. I’m as invested in conversations between Chamberlain and Bel Solomon, or the mystery of the Endless Nation as I am in anything War, Famine, and Conquest could conjure up for our pale white rider.

To your first question regarding the connection between The Western and the Apocalypse, I am no scholar of the genre, but there’s quite clearly something to this. Look at the Fallout video game franchise where post-annihilation survivors pick life up where Clint Eastwood left it in the 60’s/early 70’s (particularly in “New Vegas”). Even modern wasteland staples like Mad Max: Fury Road are all desserts and mob justice.

You know, it’s less likely to get lumped in as part of the same genre, but if you look at The Walking Dead through the same lens, you can see a lot of the same ingredients too. The protagonist is a small town sheriff just trying to protect his family and do what’s right!

To answer another of your questions, we also saw the “Hell” of the Western wasteland utilized in The Immortal Hulk, where the fresh Green hell is John Wayne era Americana. This feels like an increasingly modern take on “hell” (they don’t even have working outlets here!) but I think it’s primarily about the removal of societal standards due to some cataclysm.

For my money, East of West transcends some of these connections by blending western tropes with fantastic machinery and societal structure. It may be Armageddon but The World still seems very much able to run as a segmented whole. It’s a Western where the cowboy walks into a futuristic White Tower to assassinate the daggum president of the Union!

Oh, and yes, I’ll be coming back to Secret Wars. Always. And forever.

A few stray thoughts and questions:

I find East of West very re-readable, in part because I’ve been reading it over the course of seven years and can barely remember what happened in comics I read last week. What do you think makes the book re-readable, or do you disagree?

I mentioned above, but I find the politics of this world fascinating, and perhaps a bit ahead of their time. As political discourse has become even more divisive since the book launched, do you find these elements more or less compelling?

The introduction of Babylon is a game-changing moment for the book. What do you make of Hickman’s vision of “The Beast”?

Ok another big picture thought: What was about this time period that helped titles like East of West lead to a modern golden age of Image Comics?

I’ve written about this recently in response to this idea that Image’s incredible output from 2012 through 2015 is almost inimitably great, and they’ve been declining ever since. East of West in particular fits into an astonishing class of 2013, alongside four other series that I still have/had on my pull list (in some form) in 2019.

Image’s ability to churn out “hits” like this has faded considerably. I was reminded of this during the week listening to Contest of Challengers, the podcast of Challengers Comics in Chicago. East of West ending is yet another death knell for an era of loyal fandom, at least as it concerns Image.

So while the big picture market questions intrigue me (what precisely was in the water during this stretch?! Or, how much of this trend is Comixology Unlimited, Hoopla Digital, _Insert Easy Pirate Scan Here_ related?), for our purposes I wonder:

How does East of West compare to the rest of the Image renaissance?

East of West is (allegedly) going to make it to TV – How does it compare to its peers in terms of potential success?

Is East of West actually Hickman’s best creator-owned work?

——————————————————————————————————-

Music for Best Comics Ever by Anthony Weis. Check out more music at anthonyweis.com.

Subscribe on iTunes

Subscribe on Android

To learn how you can support Best Comics Ever and receive more exclusive content from Comic Book Herald, check out the Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/comicbookherald

For the Comic Book Herald reading club through every year of Marvel Comics, check out mymarvelousyear.com

Dave: Dave is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of Comic Book Herald, and also the Boss of assigning himself fancy titles. He's a long-time comic book fan, and can be seen most evenings in Batman pajama pants. Contact Dave @comicbookherald on Twitter or via email at dave@comicbookherald.com.
Related Post

This website uses cookies.